| CORE AREAS |  
 
  | Leadership |  
   - No shared vision or values exist
  
 - Safeguarding concerns present
  
 - Poor progress and outcomes
  
 - Over-reliance on external support
  
 - Inconsistent performance management
  
 - Poor stakeholder communication
  
  
 |  
   - Shared vision and values demonstrated
  
 - Effective safeguarding arrangements
  
 - Accurate improvement identification
  
 - Clear accountability structures
  
 - Consistent performance management
  
 - Effective community engagement
  
  
 |  
   - Values embedded in all decisions
  
 - High-quality professional development
  
 - Strategic stakeholder engagement
  
 - Innovation and risk-taking encouraged
  
 - System leadership contribution
  
 - Distributed leadership excellence
  
  
 |  
 
  | Governance |  
   - No unifying strategy or values
  
 - Poor resource management
  
 - Variable performance management
  
 - Poor policy compliance
  
 - No stakeholder consultation
  
 - Skills gaps at multiple levels
  
  
 |  
   - Coherent strategy in place
  
 - Adequate resource management
  
 - Systematic policy compliance
  
 - Clear scheme of delegation
  
 - Regular stakeholder communication
  
 - Governance handbook established
  
  
 |  
   - Deep stakeholder consultation
  
 - Exceptional resource management
  
 - Comprehensive impact evaluation
  
 - Multi-stakeholder feedback systems
  
 - Competency-based recruitment
  
 - System leadership contribution
  
  
 |  
 
  | Culture |  
   - No unifying values present
  
 - Frequent bullying allegations
  
 - Poor attendance (staff/pupils)
  
 - High exclusion levels
  
 - Elevated staff turnover
  
 - Climate of fear and lack of innovation
  
  
 |  
   - Shared values and expectations
  
 - Improving educational outcomes
  
 - National benchmark attendance
  
 - Low exclusion levels
  
 - Systematic CPD programme
  
 - Earned autonomy and innovation
  
  
 |  
   - Values demonstrated by everyone
  
 - Elevated attendance levels
  
 - Extremely low exclusions
  
 - Systematic use of stakeholder voice
  
 - Innovation actively encouraged
  
 - Celebration systems embedded
  
  
 |  
 
  | THE SIX LEVERS |  
 
  | Accountability |  
   - No clear accountability structures
  
 - Poor data collection and analysis
  
 - No stakeholder reporting
  
 - Inconsistent intervention approaches
  
 - External accountability seen as burden
  
 - Poor financial accountability
  
  
 |  
   - Clear accountability structures
  
 - Regular performance monitoring
  
 - Systematic intervention strategies
  
 - Regular stakeholder reporting
  
 - Some evaluation of initiatives
  
 - Adequate financial oversight
  
  
 |  
   - Accountability embedded in culture
  
 - Strategic use of performance data
  
 - Proactive issue identification
  
 - Comprehensive stakeholder engagement
  
 - Rigorous initiative evaluation
  
 - Exemplary financial management
  
  
 |  
 
  | Knowledge |  
   - No systematic data approach
  
 - Data stored in silos
  
 - Decisions not evidence-informed
  
 - Limited data literacy
  
 - Poor information governance
  
 - No systematic learning from evidence
  
  
 |  
   - Basic data collection systems
  
 - Some evidence-informed decisions
  
 - Growing data literacy
  
 - Improving information governance
  
 - Some evaluation taking place
  
 - Technology systems integrating
  
  
 |  
   - Sophisticated data systems
  
 - All decisions evidence-informed
  
 - High levels of data literacy
  
 - Advanced analytics capabilities
  
 - Exemplary information governance
  
 - Strategic knowledge management
  
  
 |  
 
  | Curriculum |  
   - No coherent curriculum vision
  
 - Inconsistent planning approaches
  
 - Limited progression consideration
  
 - Curriculum doesn't meet all needs
  
 - Assessment not aligned with intent
  
 - Variable delivery quality
  
  
 |  
   - Developing curriculum vision
  
 - Some consistency in planning
  
 - Some attention to progression
  
 - Beginning to address different needs
  
 - Some curriculum-assessment alignment
  
 - Some enrichment opportunities
  
  
 |  
   - Clear, ambitious curriculum vision
  
 - Highly consistent planning
  
 - Expertly designed for all pupils
  
 - Assessment fully aligned
  
 - Rich, varied enrichment
  
 - Outstanding subject leadership
  
  
 |  
 
  | Collaboration |  
   - Little or no collaboration exists
  
 - Staff work independently
  
 - No formal partnerships
  
 - Limited parent/community engagement
  
 - Competitive rather than collaborative culture
  
 - No resource or expertise sharing
  
  
 |  
   - Some collaborative activities emerging
  
 - Some practice sharing occurring
  
 - Some partnerships developing
  
 - Some professional learning communities
  
 - Some cross-curricular work
  
 - Culture becoming more collaborative
  
  
 |  
   - Collaboration systematic and embedded
  
 - Regular structured practice sharing
  
 - Strategic value-adding partnerships
  
 - Thriving professional communities
  
 - Rich cross-curricular collaboration
  
 - Strategic external collaboration
  
  
 |  
 
  | Technology |  
   - Limited or outdated infrastructure
  
 - Ad-hoc technology use
  
 - Staff lack confidence/skills
  
 - Limited pupil access
  
 - No strategic planning
  
 - Inadequate technical support
  
  
 |  
   - Basic infrastructure in place
  
 - Some technology integration
  
 - Most staff have basic skills
  
 - Some strategic planning
  
 - Some use for administration
  
 - Basic digital citizenship coverage
  
  
 |  
   - Robust, reliable infrastructure
  
 - Seamless technology integration
  
 - All staff confident users
  
 - Equitable access for all pupils
  
 - Strategic planning aligned with vision
  
 - Comprehensive digital citizenship
  
  
 |  
 
  | Pedagogy |  
   - Inconsistent teaching methods
  
 - Limited understanding of learning
  
 - Assessment doesn't support learning
  
 - Limited differentiation
  
 - Ineffective feedback to pupils
  
 - Subject knowledge gaps
  
  
 |  
   - Some consistency in approaches
  
 - Growing understanding of learning
  
 - Assessment beginning to support learning
  
 - Some differentiation taking place
  
 - Some use of research evidence
  
 - Growing repertoire of strategies
  
  
 |  
   - Highly consistent, evidence-informed practice
  
 - Deep understanding of learning science
  
 - Assessment seamlessly supports learning
  
 - Sophisticated differentiation
  
 - Outstanding subject knowledge
  
 - Extensive strategy repertoire
  
  
 |